Language has a curious way of
morphing from one meaning into another that’s very different. For example, “accept,” as in, “We must learn to accept people as they are.”
In fact, I read a quote from
a famous person whom I don’t need to identify. But here’s what he said: “Love
isn’t a state of perfect caring. It is an active noun like struggle. To love
someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right
here and now.”
Much of what this person said makes sense. Love isn’t
perfect caring; sometimes it’s a struggle – which is probably why many people
“fall out of love.” They don’t like the struggle part. They want it easy, without
strain, happy-happy-happy all the day.
The part I disagree with, at least as I understand what this
famous person said, is “accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right
here and now.” I suppose it depends on how we define “accept.” Does that mean
to approve and condone, even applaud the other individual’s behavior? In that
case, sorry, I can’t agree.
However, if it means to recognize where someone is at a
particular moment in life, but understanding – without judgment or condemnation
– that isn’t a good place to be or where they should remain, then I’m fine with
“accepting” them.
Let me
explain. Over more than 30 years of mentoring men, I've had a handful of them tell
me things in confidence they wouldn’t want anyone else to know, including their
wives. As I listened, I accepted them – didn't condemn them or pass judgment – but
at the same time, I definitely didn't respond, "Way to go – you da
man!"
We talked
and then, as their mentor, I offered ideas and advice they could choose to
consider or reject. That was totally their option, and even if they rejected
the corrective steps I recommended, I didn’t hold them in contempt. I accepted
them as they are, fellow sinners (“For
all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” – Romans 3:23), but
didn’t offer approval or affirmation.
Consider another
example: This has never happened to me, but suppose someone were to come and admit
he had an unnatural attraction to children, giving adamant assurances he had
never acted on it. What would you do?
Again, we
could “accept” the person in the sense of recognizing he was dealing with a
very serious problem. It wouldn't be necessary to condemn or judge, but I'd
certainly encourage him to seek out professional help. And follow up to ensure
that he did.
The same
applies to persons wrestling with some form of addiction. We can still love and
accept them, recognizing as the Bible also teaches, “There is no one righteous, not even one” (Romans 3:10). But wouldn’t
it be good to guide them to sources of help for overcoming their life-controlling
problem, rather than being understanding and simply saying, “I accept
you”?
To me, the
very best example was the way Jesus responded after a woman had been caught in an
act of adultery. Religious leaders had condemned her actions and were about to
stone her, until Jesus intervened. The story is recounted in John 8:1-11.
First,
Jesus put the situation into perspective, challenging the accusers, “If any one of you is without sin, let him
be the first to throw a stone at her” (John 8:7). At that moment He was
writing something on the ground with His finger. No one knows what He wrote –
perhaps Jesus was itemizing individual sins these men had committed. Toppled
from their self-righteous pedestals, one by one the men hurling accusations slipped
away.
Once they
had departed, Jesus turned back to the woman and gave acceptance. He asked, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned
you?” (John 8:10) When she replied, “No
one, sir,” Jesus responded, “Then
neither do I condemn you,” and then added, “Go now and leave your life of sin” or as another translation states it, "go and sin no more" (John 8:10-11).
This I
believe is what godly, biblical acceptance is all about. Jesus accepted this
woman, interceding to protect her from the religious leaders and their ad hoc justice.
However, at the same time He didn't condone or applaud her behavior. He didn’t excuse
or try to justify what she had done, which was clearly against God’s law. He
didn’t shrug His shoulders and say, “Well, a girl’s gotta do what a girl’s
gotta do.” Jesus simply told her not to do it any longer.
In keeping
with the motto, “What would Jesus do?” that’s our model for what we should do upon
finding someone doing something wrong or harmful, whether in behavior or
lifestyle. We don’t have to judge. In fact, we shouldn’t – that’s God’s job.
But neither does “acceptance” call for us to condone or approve it.
As someone
has said, “God loves us just the way we are – but He loves us too much to leave
us that way.” That’s why we’re offered the opportunity to become “a new creation in Christ” (2
Corinthians 5:17). We might not be able to escape our old ways in our own
strength. We might not even want to do so. But through God’s strength, we can.
No comments:
Post a Comment